Harp vs Dripify
Dripify runs LinkedIn and email sequences from its own servers, with a dedicated IP address, randomized timing inside your working hours and adaptive activity control. Harp runs LinkedIn from your own Chrome on your Mac, as one channel in a loop your agent drives.
The short answer
If you want cloud LinkedIn sequences you can set up and leave running, Dripify is built for that. If you want your agent running outbound, with LinkedIn kept in your own browser, Harp is built for that.
Side by side
| Topic | Harp | Dripify |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | The MCP harness for pipeline generation: research memory, sequences, sending, replies and LinkedIn, driven by your AI agent | Cloud-based LinkedIn automation with email steps |
| Where LinkedIn runs | Your real Chrome on your Mac, in your own session | On Dripify’s servers, with a dedicated IP address |
| Pace | Per-action limits that vary daily, four-week warm-up, right-person check | Randomized timing in working hours, adaptive activity control |
| AI | Your own agent (Claude today) on your own plan; no AI credits | AI icebreakers for personalization |
| Buying | Flat subscription after a short call; set up with you | Public plans from $79 a month per user; 7-day trial |
Set-and-forget vs agent-run
Dripify is designed for sequences you build once and let run in the cloud. Harp is designed for an agent that decides who to contact and what to say, with LinkedIn steps executed in your own browser at human pace.
When Dripify is the better choice
- You want LinkedIn sequences running with your computer off.
- You want to start today on a public plan.
- You are on Windows or Linux.
When Harp is the better choice
- You want LinkedIn to stay in your own Chrome on your Mac.
- Your AI agent should research and qualify before anyone is contacted.
- You want email replies answered within minutes.
Questions
See Harp on your own outbound
We set up every customer ourselves. Tell us how your team runs outbound today.
Talk to sales